1. #16

  2. #17
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    11.651
    20-04-2015

    Citaat Geplaatst door AboubakrSiddiq Bekijk reactie
    Wat de kolkende ideologische gisting van het Westen vereist, is zowel een sterke toewijding aan fundamentele westerse waarden als een opeenvolging van flexibele houdingen die geschikt zijn voor verschillende islamitische contexten, bevolkingen en landen. Deze aanpak zou kunnen helpen om de burgerlijke, democratische islam te ontwikkelen en tegelijkertijd het Westen de veelzijdigheid te geven om op passende wijze om te gaan met verschillende settings.

    De volgende schets beschrijft hoe een dergelijke strategie eruit zou kunnen zien. Het rust op 'vijf pijlers van de democratie' voor de islamitische wereld. De pilaren komen overeen met de houdingen die het Westen zou moeten nemen richting de vier ideologische groepen en naar de gewone burgers in moslimlanden.

    1. Ondersteun eerst de modernisten door hun versie van de islam te promoten door hen uit te rusten met een breed platform om hun opvattingen te verwoorden en te verspreiden. Het is verleidelijk om de traditionalisten te kiezen als de primaire agenten voor het bevorderen van de democratische islam, en dit lijkt de koers te zijn die het Westen geneigd is te nemen. Sommige zeer ernstige problemen pleiten echter tegen een dergelijke cursus.

    Het overdragen van de traditionalisten zou de voortdurende interne hervormingsinspanning in de islam kunnen ondermijnen en die van de modernisten, waarvan de waarden echt verenigbaar zijn met de onze, belemmeren. Van alle groepen zijn de modernisten het meest sympathiek aan de waarden en de geest van de moderne democratische samenleving. We moeten hun visie op de islam verbeteren ten opzichte van die van de traditionalisten.

    Modernisme, geen traditionalisme, is wat voor het Westen werkte. Dit omvatte de noodzaak om elementen van de oorspronkelijke religieuze doctrine te verlaten, te wijzigen en selectief te negeren. Het Oude Testament verschilt niet van de Koran in het onderschrijven van gedrag en het bevatten van een aantal regels en waarden die ondenkbaar zijn, om nog te zwijgen van illegaal, in de moderne samenleving. Dit vormt geen probleem in het Westen, omdat maar weinigen vandaag volhouden dat we allemaal op de exacte letterlijke manier van de Bijbelse patriarchen zouden moeten leven. In plaats daarvan laten we onze visie van de ware boodschap van het jodendom of het christendom de letterlijke tekst overstijgen, die we beschouwen als geschiedenis en legende. Dat is precies de benadering die door islamitische modernisten wordt voorgesteld.

    Secularisten staan ​​ook dicht bij het Westen in termen van hun waarden en beleid. Maar sommige secularisten zijn onaanvaardbaar voor het Westen vanwege hun reflexieve anti-Amerikanisme of andere posities. De secularisten hebben ook moeite om een ​​beroep te doen op de traditionele sectoren van een islamitisch publiek.

    Om deze redenen zijn de modernisten de beste partners voor het Westen. Helaas bevinden ze zich over het algemeen in een zwakkere positie dan de fundamentalisten en traditionalisten, zonder krachtige steun, financiële middelen, een effectieve infrastructuur en een openbaar platform. Daarom moeten westerse leiders de modernisten op deze manier steunen:
    Moskeeverhoren Tweede Kamer: 'gematigde moslims overheerst door radicalen'

    Gematigde moslims hebben in verschillende moskeeën in Nederland last van overheersing door orthodoxe geloofsgenoten en hun buitenlandse geldschieters. Dat blijkt uit verschillende verhoren door de Tweede Kamercommissie die ongewenste beïnvloeding van moskeeën onderzoekt. https://nos.nl/artikel/2322702-moske...radicalen.html Hmmm

  3. #18

  4. #19
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    11.651
    20-04-2015

    RAND Study Describes How West Can Counter (Radical Islam)
    Media Resources
    RAND Office of Media Relations

    (703) 413-1100, ext. 5117
    (310) 451-6913
    media@rand.org

    FOR RELEASE
    Thursday
    March 18, 2004

    The United States and its allies can best counter the destabilizing forces of radical Islam by gaining a better understanding of the broad range of views among Muslims that make some potential allies and others determined adversaries, according to a RAND Corporation study issued today.

    The study calls for a strategy that can distinguish between Muslims with whom peaceful relationships and dialogue are possible, and extremist Muslims whose values are fundamentally incompatible with democracy and the contemporary international order.

    “The United States and its allies need to be more discriminating in the way they perceive and interact with groups who call themselves Islamic,” said Cheryl Benard, a RAND analyst and author of the report. “The term is too vague, and it doesn’t really help us when we are looking to encourage progress and democratic principals, while being supportive of religious beliefs.”

    The report is titled Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, and Strategies. It describes a number of key topics or “marker issues” — such as democracy, human rights, Islamic criminal penalties, polygamy, women’s role in society, jihad, the status of minorities, and the principle of an Islamic state — that reveal a group’s underlying ideology.

    By comparing the positions groups hold on the marker issues with orthodox Islamic belief, the report concludes that the more extreme groups often take positions that are clearly contrary to Islam, although they claim to represent it.

    The report assigns groups and individuals a position along a spectrum based on their values, with radical fundamentalism at one end and radical secularism at the other. Most groups fall somewhere in between, and can be classified as fundamentalists, traditionalists, modernists, or secularists.

    A key characteristic of radical fundamentalists is their open and aggressive hostility toward the United States, coupled with a goal of damaging and destroying democratic society. Fundamentalists want to impose and expand the strict observance of Islam — which they often interpret in eccentric ways not supported by orthodox texts and sources — through force, violence, terrorism, and any other means necessary, the report says. Traditionalists tend to concentrate on keeping their community and families within a pious Islamic framework. They tend not to challenge the state, and to oppose terrorism and violence. However, they are often uncomfortable with modernity, and many of them lack education, even about the principles of their own religion, relying instead on superstitions and local tradition. In many places, they have contributed to stagnation and inertia, and have not helped their societies prosper and progress.

    Modernists and secularists are more closely aligned with the West in their values and policies, though the more extreme secularists can hold radical views that place them beyond the bounds of democracy. Modernists support reform in the hope that the Islamic world becomes part of contemporary global society. Secularists go even further, urging Muslims to accept the Western idea of a separation between religion and the state, relegating religion to a private matter.

    The views of modernists and secularists are increasingly being articulated in the Islamic world as it struggles to understand and come to terms with contemporary political and economic challenges. It is rare, however, for these positions to be heard in the West, which tends to give disproportionate attention to fundamentalists — especially since the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the RAND report says.

    The report warns that the focus on fundamentalists is obscuring Western understanding of the vibrancy and breadth of debate within Islam today. It says the most effective approach to engage the Islamic world might include a strategic combination of the following elements:

    Support the modernists first. To gain awareness and compete with the powerful fundamentalist interpretations of Islam and the appeal of its bold and aggressive stance to young people, the West can help modernists disseminate their views to mass audiences through a variety of vehicles. These include education, the media (books, radio, TV, newspapers, and Web sites), businesses, independent civic organizations, and civil society. Fundamentalists receive massive financial backing from radical sponsors. The West should help level the playing field by making alternative views of Islam available to Muslim audiences. Modernist views have the potential to be inspiring and attractive to the young — if they have the chance to hear them.

    Support the traditionalists against the fundamentalists. Traditionalism has an inclination to be moderate, an aversion to violence, and leaders who command respect and are seen as legitimate in large portions of the Muslim world. As a result, traditionalism can be a bulwark against fundamentalism. To be more effective, traditionalists may need support in the form of education, because they are often poorly educated, out of touch with the larger world and out of their league when it comes to debating against articulate fundamentalists.

    Confront and oppose the fundamentalists. Fundamentalists claim to represent true and pure Islam — an assertion vulnerable to challenge on many levels. Their violence against innocent people, the manifest errors in their interpretation of religious doctrine, and their links to corrupt and hypocritical sponsors should be better publicized in order to diminish the heroic image they cultivate with some disenchanted populations. Traditionalist criticism of the violence and extremism of fundamentalism can be publicized.

    Selectively support secularists. Even some strongly religious Muslims support the notion that religion should be separated from government, and that this separation can strengthen Islam and provides a solid groundwork for a peaceful and modern Muslim society. It is a minority view, but it should be noted where appropriate.

    The report says discrediting extreme fundamentalist beliefs and criminal actions threatens the legitimacy of the fundamentalist belief system. It does this by creating doubt within group members, demonstrating their inability to lead or cause positive change, and portraying them as cowardly and disturbed terrorists.

    A printed copy of Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, and Strategies (ISBN: 0-8330-3438-3) can be ordered online from RAND Distribution Services (phone toll-free in the United States: 1-877-584-8642; phone for all other areas: 1-310-451-7002).

    ##

    About the RAND Corporation
    The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. Sign up for RAND e-mail alerts.
    Als je besluit om te gaan dansen met de duivel in het bleke maanlicht. Let wel dat de duivel beslist wanneer de dans stopt en niet jij

  5. #20
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    642
    28-08-2020

    Ok dus die klab werken nou samen geen probleem ik ga nou voortaan elke comentaar van die koningslaafje en die 2 opblaasterroristen van de aivd melden .

  6. #21
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    642
    28-08-2020

    The Muslim World After 9/11

    by Angel Rabasa, Cheryl Benard, Peter Chalk, C. Christine Fair, Theodore W. Karasik, Rollie Lal, Ian O. Lesser, David E. Thaler


    Momentous events since September 11, 2001-Operation Enduring Freedom, the global war on terrorism, and the war in Iraq-have dramatically altered the political environment of the Muslim world. Many of the forces influencing this environment, however, are the products of trends that have been at work for many decades. This book examines the major dynamics that drive changes in the religio-political landscape of the Muslim world-a vast and diverse region that stretches from Western Africa through the Middle East to the Southern Philippines and includes Muslim communities and diasporas throughout the world-and draws the implications of these trends for global security and U.S. and Western interests. It presents a typology of ideological tendencies in the different regions of the Muslim world and identifies the factors that produce religious extremism and violence. It assesses key cleavages along sectarian, ethnic, regional, and national lines and examines how those cleavages generate challenges and opportunities for the United States. Finally, the authors identify possible strategies and political and military options for the United States to pursue in response to changing conditions in this critical and volatile part of the world.
    Related Products

    News Release
    RAND Report Proposes Ways to Cut Support for Radical Islam and Terrorism

    Dec 14, 2004

    Research Brief
    U.S. Strategy in the Muslim World After 9/11

    Jan 1, 2004

    Angel Rabasa, Cheryl Benard, et al.

    "The strengths of this work are its comprehensiveness, its accuracy, its relevance to existing policy concerns, and its organization of a welter of data (with well-conceived charts bringing needed clarity to complexities such as the diverse Muslim groups in Indonesia)."

    - Foreign Affairs, March/April 2005

    "RAND has produced an excellent overview and digest of most Islamic movements with special attention to extremist ones… An extremely useful handbook for scholars, journalists, and government officials… The studies are good mix of historical and current factors. Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above."

    - CHOICE Magazine, June 2005

    "OUTSTANDING - Comprehensive study of the Muslim World including countries of the Mahgreb, Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, India, Central and South Asia and Nigeria. A post 9/11 examination of the trends and historic factors that contribute to the Islamic extremism and divisions between the Arab Muslim and non-Arab Muslim communities as well as the world wide diaspora. This book presents the results of innovative research and indepth assessment of a diverse and complex people and ideology little understood in the U.S."

    - Recommended by a committee from the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) and the Public Library Association (PLA) for the 2005 Guide to University Press Books Selected for Public and Secondary School Libraries https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG246.html