1. #1
    Verbannen

    Reacties
    9.641
    09-10-2015

    De man achter de evolutie mythe charles darwin was een keiharde racist

    Was Charles Darwin a racist?

    Comments

    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter

    Post categories: Ethics, Northern Ireland

    William Crawley | 07:04 UK time, Friday, 13 February 2009

    darwin-1.jpgIt will come as a surprise to historians of science if it's shown that he was, since the great naturalist has recently been lauded as an abolitionist whose detestation of slavery is an under-acknowledged motivation for his scientific work. According to Henry McDonald's piece in yesterday's Guardian, an MLA has suggested that Darwin was a "racist".

    Mervyn Storey argues that Darwin's language in The Descent of Man would earn disapproval today. This is undoubtedly the case. Darwin certainly referred to Aboriginal people as "savages". There is also the language of "favoured race" in Origin of Species. But that language would not have raised an eyebrow in the nineteenth century; as always with historically placed language, we must be careful about extending our contemporary sensitivites to the past. Some of the language of the Bible would appear deeply objectionable by our contemporary lights.

    The more serious question we should ask is whether Darwin, judged by the standards of his day, would have been considered a racist -- or, quite the opposite, as a campaigner, in his own way, for the abolition of slavery based on the conviction that all human beings have a common biological parentage.

    That said, even if it were to be demonstrated that Darwin was -- even by the conventions of his day -- a racist, this conclusion may have consequences for our moral evaluation of Darwin as a man; it would contibute nothing to our evaluation of his work as science.
    1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ni/2009/0..._a_racist.html
    2. https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...view-an-wilson

  2. #2
    Verbannen

    Reacties
    9.641
    09-10-2015

    Deze boek in zijn eigen woorden zegt wat voor smerige racist hij werkelijk was iets wat de darwanisten niet vertellen .

  3. #3
    Verbannen

    Reacties
    9.641
    09-10-2015


  4. #4
    Verbannen

    Reacties
    9.641
    09-10-2015

    Wat hadden ze gemeen allemaal fan van charles darwin hitler gebruikt het voor zijn uberras project allemaal hele fijne kerels .

  5. #5
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    7.552
    12-09-2017

    Darwin maar ook bv Ibn Khaldun waren geniale mannen, wetenschappers hun tijd vooruit.
    Darwin leefde vanaf begin 19e eeuw. Ibn Khaldun in de 14e en 15e eeuw.
    Ibn Khaldun niet alleen islamwetenschapper, maar ook gezien als de vader van de geschiedsfilosofie en sociologie.

    Zij waren kinderen van hun tijd, geniaal als wetenschappers, maar hadden niet de grootheid om zich als mens te onttrekken aan de cultuur/visie zoals die vele eeuwen was.
    In zijn beroemde boek de Muqqadhdima schreef Ibn Khaldun; "Negers zijn, over het algemeen, onderworpen aan slavernij, omdat ze weinig menselijks hebben en eigenschappen bezitten gelijk aan die van stomme dieren."

  6. #6
    riffia

    Reacties
    1.463
    16-08-2015

    Citaat Geplaatst door Wouldcha3b Bekijk reactie
    Wat hadden ze gemeen allemaal fan van charles darwin hitler gebruikt het voor zijn uberras project allemaal hele fijne kerels .
    jij bent een mongool. de communisten geloven in evolutie en charles darwin. hitler geloofde in God and geloofde in creatie.
    ik verkoop chinese drugs. 15 euro per gram. het is een nieuwe drugs. speciale plastic zakje krijg je erbij. korting is mogelijk als je trouwe klant bent. bestellingen graag via pm.

    geen 4 mei voor mij! let op wegen corona tijdelijk geen chinese drugs meer beschikbaar! #stopcorona

  7. #7
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    7.552
    12-09-2017

    Citaat Geplaatst door Wouldcha3b Bekijk reactie
    Was Charles Darwin a racist?

    Comments

    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter

    Post categories: Ethics, Northern Ireland

    William Crawley | 07:04 UK time, Friday, 13 February 2009

    darwin-1.jpgIt will come as a surprise to historians of science if it's shown that he was, since the great naturalist has recently been lauded as an abolitionist whose detestation of slavery is an under-acknowledged motivation for his scientific work. According to Henry McDonald's piece in yesterday's Guardian, an MLA has suggested that Darwin was a "racist".

    Mervyn Storey argues that Darwin's language in The Descent of Man would earn disapproval today. This is undoubtedly the case. Darwin certainly referred to Aboriginal people as "savages". There is also the language of "favoured race" in Origin of Species. But that language would not have raised an eyebrow in the nineteenth century; as always with historically placed language, we must be careful about extending our contemporary sensitivites to the past. Some of the language of the Bible would appear deeply objectionable by our contemporary lights.

    The more serious question we should ask is whether Darwin, judged by the standards of his day, would have been considered a racist -- or, quite the opposite, as a campaigner, in his own way, for the abolition of slavery based on the conviction that all human beings have a common biological parentage.

    That said, even if it were to be demonstrated that Darwin was -- even by the conventions of his day -- a racist, this conclusion may have consequences for our moral evaluation of Darwin as a man; it would contibute nothing to our evaluation of his work as science.
    1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ni/2009/0..._a_racist.html
    2. https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...view-an-wilson

    Mythe: "verhaal dat veel mensen kennen, maar dat niet werkelijk is gebeurd."

    Wetenschappelijke theorie: "‘een samenhangend geheel van denkbeelden, verklaringen en hypothesen’ die kunnen worden gebruikt om de werkelijkheid te beschrijven."

  8. #8
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    7.229
    16-09-2014

    Dat het tegenwoordig not done is om de verschillen tussen verschillende rassen te benoemen, betekent natuurlijk niet dat er geen verschillen zijn.

    Als wetenschapper maakte Darwin wel een verschil, en dat maakt hem per definitie een racist.

    Dat betekent uiteraard niet dat zijn wetenschappelijke werk opeens waardeloos is, behalve natuurlijk als je iets anders gelooft en alles wil doen om wetenschappelijk bewijs dat iets anders beweert dan wat jij gelooft, zwart wil maken.

  9. #9
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    3.427
    27-04-2015

    Man, man, man, een blog uit 2009!!

    Moet niet triester worden hier!

  10. #10
    Bijna Lid

    Reacties
    2.753
    23-10-2014

    the European race, following the inevitable laws of natural selection, will emerge as the distinct species, human being, and all the transitional forms—such as the gorilla, chimpanzee, Negro, Australian aborigine and so on—will be extinct (Wiker 2002:250).

    At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes ... will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla (Darwin 1887:156).

    “With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.

  11. #11
    Verbannen

    Reacties
    5.338
    28-01-2017


















    [/QUOTE]

  12. #12
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    21.391
    18-12-2015

    En een freemason

  13. #13
    Verbannen

    Reacties
    9.641
    09-10-2015

    Citaat Geplaatst door Aviator Bekijk reactie
    Man, man, man, een blog uit 2009!!

    Moet niet triester worden hier!
    Vergeet de blog het staat in zijn boek origin of species wat de handboek is van de witte suprematie gedachtegoed deze man was een racist , Maar ja tegen wie praat ik jullie lezen geen boeken en zeker geen boeken van boven 600 paginas alles staat in zijn boeken .

  14. #14
    Verbannen

    Reacties
    9.641
    09-10-2015

    Nazi governmental policy was openly influenced by Darwinism, the Zeitgeist of both science and educated society of the time.10 This can be evaluated by an examination of extant documents, writings, and artefacts produced by Germany’s twentieth century Nazi movement and its many scientist supporters. Keith concluded the Nazi treatment of Jews and other ‘races’, then believed ‘inferior’, was largely a result of their belief that Darwinism provided profound insight that could be used to significantly improve humankind.14 Tenenbaum noted that the political philosophy of Germany was built on the belief that critical for evolutionary progress were:

    ‘ … struggle, selection, and survival of the fittest, all notions and observations arrived at … by Darwin … but already in luxuriant bud in the German social philosophy of the nineteenth century. … Thus developed the doctrine of Germany’s inherent right to rule the world on the basis of superior strength … [of a] “hammer and anvil” relationship between the Reich and the weaker nations.’ 14
    https://answersingenesis.org/charles...ace-holocaust/

  15. #15
    MVC Lid

    Reacties
    2.017
    05-03-2017

    Racist of niet, ik denk van niet, zijn theorie staat als een huis.