Bekijk volle/desktop versie : Niqaab



Pagina's : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

09-08-2013, 03:45

Assalaamou Alaykoum wara7matullaahi waBarakatouhou!

Ik heb al eerder een topic geopend over de niqaab, maar vond deze nogal onoverzichtelijk worden. Daarom heb ik besloten in dit hoekje een nieuw topic aan te maken In shaa Allaah! Ik heb inmiddels ook weer andere bewijzen gevonden en dit topic zal dus ook anders worden dan mijn vorige topic.

Ik open dit topic niet om een discussie uit te lokken. Ik wil enkel meer duidelijkheid geven over de niqaab. Ik hoop dat ik d.m.v. dit topic mensen een beetje een andere visie kan geven aangezien er nogal veel onwetendheid heerst m.b.t. dit onderwerp.

Moge Allaah mij vergeven indien ik fouten heb gemaakt.




Bismillaah


09-08-2013, 03:47


Narrated by Safiya bint Shaiba

'Aisha used to say: "When (the Verse): "They should draw their veils over their necks and bosoms," was revealed, (the ladies) cut their waist sheets at the edges and covered their faces with the cut pieces.

[Sahih al bukhari: Volume 6, Book 60, Number 282][/SIZE]


09-08-2013, 03:54

Geschreven door Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal

Imam Ahmad zei: 'Zelfs de nagel van de vrouw is awrah, dus als zij haar huis verlaat, mag zij niets daarvan onbedekt laten, ook niet haar sokken, want die laten de vorm van haar voeten zien en ik heb liever dat ze haar mouwen dicht maakt, zodat er niemand erin kan kijken." [al Foeroe' 1/601]

ahlul-tawhid.com


09-08-2013, 03:58




De hijaab en de bewijzen voor het bedekken van het gezicht:
http://www.docdroid.net/6a0r/de-hidjaab-en-de-bewijzen-voor-het-bedekken-van-het-gezicht.pdf.html

De meningen van de grote geleerden over de niqaab:
http://www.docdroid.net/6a0t/de-meningen-van-de-grote-geleerden-over-de-niqaab.pdf.html

The Face Veil; Sheikh Albaani:
http://www.docdroid.net/6a0u/faceveil.pdf.html


09-08-2013, 04:02


Broeder Abdul-Jabbar van der Ven: de niqaab; voor- en tegen argumenten.

[video=youtube_share;WrtG95nE6Y0]http://youtu.be/WrtG95nE6Y0[/video]

Deel 1: http://youtu.be/WrtG95nE6Y0
Deel 2: http://youtu.be/ZZ-Ez-M3Phk
Deel 3: http://youtu.be/vV36wboaXAk
Deel 4: http://youtu.be/MtR51t-evYU
Deel 5: http://youtu.be/aDZVHK3Z4Po
Deel 6: http://youtu.be/6dbooXOlSks
Deel 7: http://youtu.be/Z2pzFijUGXQ


09-08-2013, 04:09
The Ruling of Niqaab in non-Muslim countries | Sheikh Muhammad bin Saalih al-'Uthaymeen

[video=youtube;WXPyCaf6eMo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXPyCaf6eMo[/video]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXPyCaf6eMo

09-08-2013, 04:14
De niqaab op de weegschaal van Allaah:

http://islaamtv.nl/beta/?p=3228

09-08-2013, 04:23
Is wearing a Niqab compulsory for women in Islam?

[video=youtube_share;QOglpbtzlzw]http://youtu.be/QOglpbtzlzw[/video]
http://youtu.be/QOglpbtzlzw

09-08-2013, 04:29
NIQAB IS OBLIGATORY - Haitham Al-Haddad

[video=youtube_share;4Ki66dUo1eA]http://youtu.be/4Ki66dUo1eA[/video]
http://youtu.be/4Ki66dUo1eA

09-08-2013, 04:40
Er word vaak een hadith aangehaald dat de handen en het gezicht zichtbaar mogen zijn. Maar dit is een hadith da'ief! wa Allaahu a3lam Zie hier het bewijs!!!! :



Citaat:
Hadeeth about women uncovering their faces

How sound is that hadeeth in which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is reported to have said, “When a woman reaches the ages of adolescence, nothing should be seen of her except her face and hands”? How should the Muslim woman dress, based on this? What if extreme hijab will cause problems for a woman in the society in which she lives?.


Praise be to Allaah.

The hadeeth mentioned in the question was narrated by Abu Dawood (4104) from al-Waleed from Sa’eed ibn Basheer from Qataadah from Khaalid ibn Durayk from ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her), that Asma’ bint Abi Bakr entered upon the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) wearing a thin dress. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) turned away from her and said, “O Asma’, when a woman reaches the age of puberty, nothing should be seen of her except this and this” – and he pointed to his face and hands.

Abu Dawood said: This is mursal; Khaalid ibn Durayk did not meet ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her).

This hadeeth is da’eef (weak) and is not fit to be used as evidence. The reasons why it is da’eef are as follows:

1 – Its isnaad is interrupted, as was stated by Imam Abu Dawood (may Allaah have mercy on him) when he said, “This is mursal; Khaalid ibn Durayk did not meet ‘Aa’ishah.”

2 – Its isnaad includes Sa’eed ibn Basheer al-Azdi (or it was said al-Basri) Abu ‘Abd al-Rahmaan. Some scholars of hadeeth regarded him as thiqah (trustworthy), but Ahmad, Ibn Ma’een, Ibn al-Madeeni, al-Nasaa’i, al-Haakim and Abu Dawood regarded him as da’eef. (weak).

Muhammad ibn ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Numayr said of him: His hadeeth is to be rejected and he does not amount to anything, and he is not strong in hadeeth. He narrated munkar reports from Qataadah.

Ibn Hibbaan said of him: He has a bad memory and makes grievous mistakes.

Al-Haafiz ibn Hajar said of him: (he is) da’eef.

3 – Its isnaad includes Qataadah who is mudallis (i.e., gives false impressions concerning the narration of the hadeeth) and did not clearly state that he heard the hadeeth from another. It also includes al-Waleed ibn Muslim of whom al-Haafiz said: (he is) trustworthy but he was also mudallis and did not clearly state that he heard the hadeeth from another.

These are the faults in the hadeeth because of which the hadeeth was judged to be da’eef (weak). See Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, Majallat al-Buhooth, 21/68.

Even if we assume that the hadeeth is saheeh or is strengthened by corroborating reports, the scholars have also noted that this incident occurred before hijab was enjoined. Ibn Qudaamah said: “With regard to the hadeeth of Asma’, it is to be understood as having occurred before the verse of hijab was revealed.”

Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “Even if we assume it is saheeh, it is to be interpreted as referring to the time before hijab was revealed.” See ‘Awdat al-Hijaab, 3/336.

If we study the text of the hadeeth , we will find that it is extremely unlikely, because Asma’ (may Allaah be pleased with her) was very pious and modest, so she would not have worn these thin clothes and appeared in them in front of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

The correct view on this matter is that it is obligatory for women to cover their entire bodies in front of non-mahram men. See question no. 21134.

If hijab is going to lead to problems for a woman in the society in which she lives, then she must be patient and seek reward for the problems she encounters for the sake of adhering to her religion and obeying her Lord. We have a good example in our righteous forebears, may Allaah be pleased with them, because they were persecuted severely for the sake of Allaah, but that did not turn them away from their religion, rather the persecution and torment only increased their adherence to their religion. Perhaps the days we are living through are the days of patience of which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) told us when he said: “There will come a time of patience when the one who adheres steadfastly to his religion will be like one who holds a burning coal.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 2260; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 957.

Al-Qaari said: The apparent meaning of this hadeeth is that just as it is impossible to hold on to a burning coal except with intense patience and great difficulty, at that time no one will be able to adhere to his religion and the light of faith except with great patience.

From Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi.

Al-Mannaawi said in Fayd al-Qadeer:

The one who is patient in adhering to the rulings of the Qur’aan and Sunnah is likened, in the difficulties that he encounters from the followers of innovation and misguidance, to one who takes hold of fire; it may be even more difficult than that. This is one of the miracles of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): he spoke of the unseen and it came to pass.

We ask Allaah to make us steadfast in adhering to His religion until we meet Him.

And Allaah knows best.

Islam Q&A
Engels: http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/23496
Arabisch: http://www.islamqa.com/ar/23496

09-08-2013, 04:44
Ruling on covering the face, with detailed evidence.

Engels: http://islamqa.info/en/ref/11774
Arabisch: http://islamqa.info/ar/11774




[Tekst is te lang om in 1 bericht te voegen, vandaar alleen de links]

09-08-2013, 04:45
Ruling on taking off the niqab in foreign countries.


Citaat:

I am very confused and I would like to find out the ruling. I took off my niqab because people were staring at me, because my husband said, “I don’t like to look at you.” That is because all the people are looking at me and finding it (my niqab) strange. My husband decided that I should take it off, because he said: I do not want people to look at you but you are attracting attention to yourself by wearing the niqab. So I took the niqab off, but I am very sad about what I have done; but my husband told me that it is sufficient to wear the Islamic abayah and hijab and cover completely except the face. What should I do? What is the ruling? Is that permissible or not? Is it permissible for me to wear a jacket over the abayah when it is cold, because I heard that wearing the jacket is not permissible because it shows the woman’s shoulders and the shape of her body. What is the ruling if I drive by myself to work and I work on my own in some place?


Praise be to Allah.

Firstly:

It is obligatory for a woman to cover all of her body in front of non-mahram men, including the face. This is the correct opinion, as explained previously in the answer to question no. 11774.

The woman is obliged to adhere to that even if she is in a non-Muslim society, out of obedience to her Lord and adherence to her religion. It does not matter if people stare or find it strange. Usually this astonishment fades after awhile, when the woman becomes known in her neighbourhood and the area around her.

The fuqaha’ have stipulated that for it to be permissible for a Muslim to live in a non-Muslim country, the Muslim should be able to practice his religion openly. If he is not able to practice his religion openly, it is haraam for him to stay there and he is obliged to migrate if possible.

For more information, please see the answer to question no. 146854

Secondly:

There is nothing wrong with wearing a jacket on cold days, on condition that it be worn under the khimaar. Thus the problem of showing the size of the shoulders and shape of the body will be avoided. If it is not possible to wear it beneath the khimaar, then the jacket should be large and not show the true size.

Thirdly:

It is permissible for a woman to work on her own in a place, if she is safe and can avoid being alone with non-mahram men, by leaving the door open or by having the front of the place made of glass, and so on; she should also limit conversation to what is necessary.

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked: I heard that it is permissible for a woman to work in buying and selling. Is that permissible if I adhere to hijab?

He replied: Yes, it is permissible for a woman to work in buying and selling, or renting, on condition that this does not lead to anything that is forbidden in Islam and this is how it has always been among the Muslims. We see that in the case of ‘Aa’ishah the Mother of the Believers (may Allah be pleased with her): Bareerah came to her asking for help in freeing herself from slavery. Then ‘Aa’ishah bought her from her masters (and subsequently manumitted her). This is how people are nowadays: a woman may go to a store and buy something from the shopkeeper, and he may sell to her. Similarly, a woman may have property that she rents out. The point is that there is nothing wrong with a woman buying and selling, but that is subject to the condition that it does not lead to anything that is forbidden in Islam. If it does lead to something that is forbidden in Islam, such as mixing with men in a haraam manner, then it is not permissible.

End quote from Fataawa Noor ‘ala ad-Darb.

For information on women driving, please see the answer to question no. 45880.

And Allah knows best.

Islam Q&A
Engels: http://www.islamqa.com/en/152061
Arabisch: http://www.islamqa.com/ar/152061

09-08-2013, 04:49


Do women have to wear niqaab?


Citaat:

Is wearing niqaab one of the conditions of Islamic dress for women?


Praise be to Allaah.

Hijaab in Arabic means covering or concealing. Hijaab is the name of something that is used to cover. Everything that comes between two things is hijaab.

Hijaab means everything that is used to cover something and prevent anyone from reaching it, such as curtains, door keepers and garments, etc.

Khimaar comes from the word khamr, the root meaning of which is to cover. For example, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Khammiru aaniyatakum (cover your vessels).” Everything that covers something else is called its khimaar.

But in common usage khimaar has come to be used as a name for the garment with which a woman covers her head; in some cases this does not go against the linguistic meaning of khimaar.

Some of the fuqahaa’ have defined it as that which covers the head, the temples and the neck.

The difference between the hijaab and the khimaar is that the hijaab is something which covers all of a woman’s body, whilst the khimaar in general is something with which a woman covers her head.

Niqaab is that with which a woman veils her face (tantaqib)…

The difference between hijaab and niqaab is that the hijaab is that which covers all the body, whilst niqaab is that which covers a woman’s face only.

The woman’s dress as prescribed in sharee’ah (“Islamic dress&rdquo is that which covers her head, face and all of her body.

But the niqaab or burqa’ – which shows the eyes of the woman – has become widespread among women, and some of them do not wear it properly. Some scholars have forbidden wearing it on the grounds that it is not Islamic in origin, and because it is used improperly and people treat it as something insignificant, demonstrating negligent attitudes towards it and using new forms of niqaab which are not prescribed in Islam, widening the opening for the eyes so that the cheeks, nose and part of the forehead are also visible.

Therefore, if the woman’s niqaab or burqa’ does not show anything but the eyes, and the opening is only as big as the left eye, as was narrated from some of the salaf, then that is permissible, otherwise she should wear something which covers her face entirely.

Shaykh Muhammad al-Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

The hijaab prescribed in sharee’ah means that a woman should cover everything that it is haraam for her to show, i.e., she should cover that which it is obligatory for her to cover, first and foremost of which is the face, because it is the focus of temptation and desire.

A woman is obliged to cover her face in front of anyone who is not her mahram (blood relative to whom marriage is forbidden). From this we learn that the face is the most essential thing to be covered. There is evidence from the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and the views of the Sahaabah and the imams and scholars of Islam, which indicates that women are obliged to cover all of their bodies in front of those who are not their mahrams.

Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/ 391, 392)

Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

The correct view as indicated by the evidence is that the woman’s face is ‘awrah which must be covered. It is the most tempting part of her body, because what people look at most is the face, so the face is the greatest ‘awrah of a woman. This is in addition to the shar’i evidence which states that it is obligatory to cover the face.

For example, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms)…”

[al-Noor 24:31]

Drawing the veil all over the juyoob implies covering the face.

When Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) was asked about the aayah (interpretation of the meaning):

“O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies”

[al-Ahzaab 33:59] –

he covered his face, leaving only one eye showing. This indicates that what was meant by the aayah was covering the face. This was the interpretation of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) of this aayah, as narrated from him by ‘Ubaydah al-Salmaani when he asked him about it.

In the Sunnah there are many ahaadeeth, such as: the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The woman in ihraam is forbidden to veil her face (wear niqaab) or to wear the burqa’.” This indicates that when women were not in ihraam, women used to cover their faces.

This does not mean that if a woman takes off her niqaab or burqa’ in the state of ihraam that she should leave her face uncovered in the presence of non-mahram men. Rather she is obliged to cover it with something other than the niqaab or burqa’, on the evidence of the hadeeth of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) who said: “We were with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in ihraam, and when men passed by us, we would lower the khimaar on our heads over our faces, and when they moved on we would lift it again.”

Women in ihraam and otherwise are obliged to cover their faces in front of non-mahram men, because the face is the center of beauty and it is the place that men look at… and Allaah knows best.

Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/396, 397

He also said:

It is OK to cover the face with the niqaab or burqa’ which has two openings for the eyes only, because this was known at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and because of necessity. If nothing but the eyes show, this is fine, especially if this is customarily worn by women in her society.

Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/399

And Allaah knows best.

Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
Engels: http://www.islamqa.com/en/21134
Arabisch: http://www.islamqa.com/ar/21134

09-08-2013, 04:50
The obligation of veiling the face and hands [Madkhali]:
http://www.troid.ca/media/kunena/attachments/legacy/files/theobligationofveiling.pdf

Shaykh al'Abani´s position of Niqab of muslim woman from his famous book: Jilbab Ul-Mar’at Il-Muslimah:

http://maktabasalafiya.blogspot.nl/2011/06/shaykh-alabanis-position-of-niqab-of.html?m=1

09-08-2013, 04:50


geschreven door: Abu Kinanah
[SIZE=2" -->



De wetscholen hebben verschild of het gezicht en de handen awra is of niet, maar zij hebben niet verschild dat als er sprake kan zijn van fitnah dat zij haar gezicht moet bedekken.

Hanafitische wetschool

Al-Jassas zegt:"De jonge vrouw is opgedragen om haar gezicht te bedekken voor de niet-mahram, en het uiten van kuisheid als zij naar buiten gaat, zodat de zieken niet de gevoel krijgen om haar lastig te vallen.[Ahkaam al-Koran 3/458]

As-Saharnfoeri al-Hanafi zegt:"Alle moslims zijn het erover eens dat de vrouwen verboden worden om naar buiten te gaan met niet bedekte gezichten, vooral in de tijden van verspreiding van het kwaad."[badhl al majhoed sharh soenan abie dawoed 16/431]

De Malikitische wetschool

Aboe Ali al-Meschdalie zei:' Diegene die zijn vrouw naar buiten laat gaan om haar dagelijkse behoefte te doen, terwijl haar gezicht onbedekt is, zoals de boerinnen, deze man geldt niet als een imam en zijn getuigenis is ongeldig. [Al mi'yaar al moe'arab 11/193]

Dit is in dar al Islam en en met een niet-mahram wordt de vreemde moslim bedoelt, maar de kaafir man die mag niks van de vrouw zien!

Alaich zegt:"Maar de kaafir niet-mahram, hij mag niks van haar lichaam zien, zelfs haar gezicht en handen, wat voor dwaling is het dan wat sommige vrouwen doen die hen gezichten niet bedekken voor een jood."[Manh al Jalil, paragraaf sitr al awrah]

Shafi'tische wetschool

Ibn Hajr overlevert een uitspraak van Al-Ziyaadi en bevestigt die:" De awra van de vrouw bij een niet-mahram man is haar hele lichaam, ook de gezicht en de handen."
Auteur van Nihaya zei:'Het is verplicht voor de vrouw om haar gezicht te bedekken als zij in ihraam is(op Hajj), zodat de mannen die ook in ihraam zijn haar niet zien."[toehfat al moehtaaj 2/112 & 4/165]

Ibn Raslaan zei:'De moslims zijn het erover eens dat het verboden is om de vrouwen naar buiten te laten gaan terwijl hen gezichten niet bedekt zijn, vooral in tijden waarin de foesaaq toenemen."[Awn al ma'boed 11/162]

En deze uitspraak van Nawawi:
Imam Nawawi zei:'Het is verboden voor de moslima om haar gezicht te laten zien aan een joodse of christelijke vrouw of andere ongelovige vrouwen, alleen als de kafira een slavin van haar is, dit is de correct mening binnen de wetschool van Imam Shafi'ie[Al fatawa 192]

Ibn Hajr zegt:"Het is de norm dat de vrouwen toegestaan werd om naar de markten te gaan of naar de moskeen terwijl zij een gezichtsbedekking dragen, zodat de mannen hen niet zien."[fath al bari 9/337]


De Hanbalitische wetschool

de mening van deze school is welberoemd, maar ik noem er toch een van de imam zelf.

Imam Ahmad zei:'Zelfs de nagel van de vrouw is awra, dus als zij haar huis verlaat, mag zij niets daarvan onbedekt laten, ook niet haar sokken, want die laat de vorm van haar voeten zien en ik heb liever dat ze haar mouwen dicht maakt, zodat er niemand erin kan kijken."[al Foeroe' 1/601]



De Maliki Wetschool

Imaam Al-Abi overleverd in Jawaahir al-Ikleel dat de Maliki geleerde Ibn Marzooq heeft gezegd dat:

De Mashoor (bekende) mening in de Madhab van Imaam Maalik is dat het Verplicht (Wujoob) is om het gezicht te bedekken en de handen als er gevaar is dat een vreemde naar haar kijkt. (Vol.1 pag.41)

In de boeken met de hoogste autoriteit in de moderne Maliki Fatawaa collectie Al-Miyar, Imaam Ahmad al-Wansharisi overleverd de volgende Fatwa aangaande een Imaam die zijn vrouw het huis laat verlaten zonder het bedekken van haar gezicht, hij zegt:

Het is niet toegestaan voor hem om aangewezen te worden als een Imaam die het gebed lijdt, zijn getuigenis wordt niet geacepteerd in de Rechtbank, noch is het toegestaan om hem van de Zakaah te geven wanneer hij deze nodig heeft. Hij blijft onder de Toorn van Allah zolang hij doorgaat met het toestaan hiervan. (Vol.11 pag. 193-194)

Qadi Abu Bakr Bin Al-Arabi heeft gezegd in zijn Juridische Tafsir van de Qur'aan, Ahkam Al-Qur'an:

De vrouw in haar geheel is 'Awrah, haar lichaam en haar stem. Dus het is niet toegestaan dit te tonen behalve in een zeer noodzakelijke situatie, zoals dat er tegen haar getuigd wordt of omdat er een ziekte is aan haar lichaam en zo te vragen wat voor pijn zij voelt. (Vol.3 pag. 1578).

Pagina's : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10