Men heeft al geen argumenten, men heeft een ongefundeerde mening over iets.
Gooien dan veel stof op, in de hoop dat men snel over iets anders kan beginnen.
Maar helaas. Als men een uitspraakt toekent aan iemand, wil ik graag
zien waar dat vandaan komt.
En als men dat niet kan aanleveren, is men een praatjesmaker.
De ideologische achtergrond van het darwinisme
zaterdag 26 februari 2011
De communistische leiders doorheen de geschiedenis en Darwins evolutietheorie
Net als Marx en Engels, beschouwden ook hun volgelingen de evolutietheorie in opperste verrukking. De communistische revolutie waar Marx van droomde, werd in praktijk gezet door Lenin, de leider van de Bolsjewistische beweging in Rusland. Hij drukte zijn mening over Darwin als volgt uit:
“Darwin gaf een einde aan het geloof dat de planten- en dierensoorten niets met elkaar te maken hebben, dat ze door God geschapen zijn en dat ze daarom onveranderlijk zijn.”[i]
De tweede man na Lenin van de Bolsjewistische revolutie, was Leon Trotski. Trotski drukte zijn bewondering voor Darwin uit door zijn werk “de grootste overwinning van het dialectiek op vlak van organische materie”[ii] te noemen.
Stalin, die de dictatuur overnam de Sovjet-Unie overnam in 1928, werd evenwel beïnvloed door Darwins ideeën.
Hij [Stalin] ging nog naar de lagere school toen hij Darwin’s Origin of Species las en The Descent of Man las. [...]
Deze boeken hadden een diep effect of Soso. Ze vernietigden zijn religieuze ideeën die hij kreeg van zijn moeder of van zijn opleiding op school. Yaroslavsky heeft in zijn herinneringen opgenomen dat een jeugdvriend geschokt was toen hij de jonge Stalin hoorde zeggen: “Je weet, ze houden ons voor de gek. Er is geen God.” “Hoe kun je zulke dinges zeggen, Soso?”, riep zijn vriend. “Ik zal u een boek lenen om te lezen. Het zal je laten zien dat de wereld en alle levende wezens heel verschillend zijn dan dat jij je voorstelt en dat het gepraat over God pure onzin is.”, antwoordde Soso en drong zijn vriend aan om de werken van Darwin te lezen.[iii]
De stichter van het Russisch communisme, Georgi Plekhanov, noemde het marxisme, de toepassing van het darwinisme aan de menswetenschappen. [iv]
De stichter van het Chinees communisme, Mao Tsedong was net als Stalin een fan van Darwin geworden door het lezen van zijn boeken:
Hij [Mao] werkte toen hij naar school ging als assistent in een bibliotheek, waar hij toegang had tot de werken van Karl Marx en hij had veel tijd om deze revolutionaire literatuur te verslinden. Hij heeft ook Darwin en Huxley gelezen. [...] Van Mao was gekend dat hij Darwin en de radicale evolutionist Huxley beschouwde als zijn twee favoriete auteurs.[v]
Ook vandaag verdedigen communistische leiders het darwinisme. De verklaringen van Abdullah Öcalan, de leider van PKK, de communistische separatistische terroristische organisatie in Turkije:
In het begin was er tussen de mens en de diersoorten dicht bij hem, niet veel verschil. Hij at wat hij klaar vond in de natuur, schuilde gewoon in bomen en holten. Maar met het verwerven van het vermogen om te spreken en te denken, werd het onvermijdelijk dat hij bij het verzamelen van voedsel, om zich te beschermen tegen andere dieren en tegen natuurrampen, en bij de ontwikkeling van verschillende primitieve stenen werktuigen, solidariteit ging tonen met zijn soortgenoten. Tot dat stadium gold de wet van biologische evoluties, die van toepassing is tussen dieren. [vi]
“Het meest geavanceerd sociaal dier is de mens. De mens is het wildste dier, het meest meedogenloze dier.” [vii] http://goto.marokko.nl/?url=http%3A%...orheen-de.html
The Line Running from Charles Darwin through Margaret Sanger to Planned Parenthood
Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was a racist and a proponent of eugenics, the effort to breed a superior human race in the name of Darwinian biology.
Public domain
An illustration from Birth Control Review, 1918
By John West Published on September 7, 2015 • 2 Comments
John West
Imagine if Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush and Speaker of the House John Boehner both accepted an award named for slave-owner and President of the Confederacy Jefferson Davis.
Imagine further that Jeb Bush enthusiastically defended his award by proclaiming: “I am really in awe of Jefferson Davis, and there are a lot of lessons we can learn from his life.”
The editorial pages of The New York Times and The Washington Post, not to mention the talking heads at MSNBC and CNN, would likely condemn Bush and Boehner as crypto-racists and insist they return — or trash — their awards.
Of course, neither Bush nor Boehner have really received a Jefferson Davis award to my knowledge.
But here is the kicker: Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and former speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi have received an award honoring a similarly unsavory person, and yet neither of them has been called to account by the establishment media.
Both Clinton and Pelosi are past recipients of the Margaret Sanger Award, named for the fanatical supporter of eugenics who founded Planned Parenthood.
Margaret Sanger Quality CartoonEugenics was the effort to breed a superior human race in the name of Darwinian biology. Its supporters (which included the nation’s top evolutionary biologists) were terrified that society was destroying itself because it was preventing natural selection from killing off the poor, the sick and the handicapped, and from thinning down the “inferior races.”
Far from being embarrassed at receiving an award named for Sanger, Hillary Clinton expressed effusive praise of Sanger at the award ceremony, saying, “I am really in awe of her, and there are a lot of lessons that we can learn from her life.”
Planned Parenthood continues to be in the news for undercover videos showing that some of its clinics traffic in the body parts of aborted babies. As gruesome as the current controversy is, the callous attitude toward the value of human life displayed in the videos is pretty much in line with the views of the organization’s founder.
Although Sanger is depicted today by her defenders as a great humanitarian, Sanger herself warned of the “dangers inherent in the very idea of humanitarianism and altruism, dangers which have today produced their full harvest of human waste, of inequality and inefficiency.”
In Sanger’s view, humanitarianism threatened to swamp America with a tidal wave of the “feeble-minded.” As I explain in my book Darwin Day in America, feeblemindedness was an expansive category that included many people who today wouldn’t be considered mentally handicapped, including members of races (like blacks) considered by Darwinian biologists of the time to be “lower” on the evolutionary scale. “Feebleminded” persons could read. They could hold jobs. They could appear perfectly normal to everyone else. That’s why they were so dangerous according to eugenists. The feeble-minded could appear so ordinary that non-feebleminded persons might marry them and then spread their defective “germplasm” to the next generation.
Sanger branded the feeble-minded a “menace … to the race” and compared them to “weeds.” In her bestselling book The Pivot of Civilization, she wrote that “our eyes should be opened to the terrific cost to the community of this dead weight of human waste.”
Sanger and other eugenists argued that the feeble-minded must be prevented through compulsory sterilization from reproducing themselves.
So much for “freedom of choice” in having children.
Sanger prosecuted her crusade against the feeble-minded across America. At Vassar College in 1926, she spoke in apocalyptic terms about the ruinous costs to taxpayers of social spending to care for defectives, warning that “the American public is taxed, heavily taxed, to maintain an increasing race of morons, which threatens the very foundations of our civilization.” The same year she presented her message to a branch of the Ku Klux Klan in New Jersey. Her Klan talk was such a rousing success according to Sanger that afterward “a dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.”
Following World War II, the American crusade for sterilization in the name of eugenics largely moved underground after Americans learned of the horrors of the Nazi eugenics program.
Human Waste SangerBirth Control Review, 1918
From Birth Control Review, 1918
Sanger, however, remained uncowed. She continued to publicly advocate a national sterilization policy, although she lamented that because of the Nazis “the word has acquired some unpleasant connotations which it does not deserve.”
If you think Sanger’s views are completely out of sync with Planned Parenthood’s current leadership, consider the views of her grandson Alexander. Chair of the International Planned Parenthood Council, Alexander Sanger champions abortion as a practice that evolved through Darwinian natural selection to help humans survive.
“Humanity has evolved to take conscious control of reproduction and has done so in order to survive,” he declares. “… We cannot repeal the laws of natural selection. Nature does not let every life form survive. Humanity uniquely, and to its benefit, can exercise some dominion over this process.”
In other words, abortion allows us to eradicate some children so that other children might survive and the human species improve.
Margaret Sanger’s spirit of Social Darwinism is apparently alive and well among some of Planned Parenthood leaders of today. https://stream.org/margaret-sanger-e...ed-parenthood/
Beste Wouldcha3b,
Nog steeds kun je niets onderbouwen van je eerdere stellingen,
dus nog steeds ben je alleen ongefundeerde onzin aan het verkopen.
En die laatste comment, bewijst zelfs het tegenovergestelde van wat je eerder zei.
The eugenicists’ arrogant certainty that, because they had inherited money and power, they were genetically superior to the rest of the human race, found in Charles Darwin’s theories an ideal pretext and a program: to take the survival of the fittest and make it happen faster, by stopping the “unfit” from breeding. The goal, in Margaret Sanger’s own words, was “More Children from the Fit, Fewer from the Unfit.” Instead of seeing the poor as victims of injustice or targets for Christian charity, the materialism these elitists took from Darwin assured them that the poor were themselves the problem — that they were inferior, deficient and dangerous down to the marrow of their bones.
https://evolutionnews.org/2016/11/the_rest_of_the/